The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About220210 OCRC Full Packetr TO: Galesburg Overall Code Review Commission FROM: Eric Heiden, Code Compliance Supervisor DATE: Feb 2, 2022 SUBJECT: Overall Code Review Commission Meeting A meeting of the Overall Code Review Commission will be held on Thursday, Feb 10,2022, at 5:30 p.m. in the Curtis H. Erickson Conference Room of the Galesburg City Hall, 55 West Tompkins Street. AGENDA Approve Update Receive Minutes of the December 2,2020 meeting. Past Overall Code Review Commission items. General Citizen Comments OC-22-0201 Public Hearing Variance request of Table 705.8 of the 2012 International Building Code to allow for openings on the south side of the building at 95 N. Seminary. OC-22-0202 Public Hearing Variance request of Section 602.2 and table 601 for the use of wood studs in a type 2B building located at 1611 Grand Ave. COMMISSION MEMBERS PLEASE NOTIFY MY OFFICE IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING AT 345-3619, OR FAX AT 345-5704, OR E-MAIL AT eheiden@ci.galesburg.il.us. cc: Mayor Council Members (7) City Manager Director of Community Development City Clerk Electrical Inspector Plumbing Inspector Randy Hovind, GFD Fire Chief/Fire Marshall. News Media (7) File Copy MINUTES OVERALL CODE REVIEW COMMISSION MEETING VIA GOOGLE MEET Thursday, December 10, 2020 at 5:44 p.m. MEMBERS PHYSICALLY PRESENT: None. MEMBERS PRESENT VIA PHONE/VIDEO: Brian Benbow, Rob Benedict, Mike Groom, Ken Swanson, 4. MEMBERS ABSENT: Jay Feely, Kyle Kelly, Dale Sugden, 3. OTHERS PRESENT: Rory Speidel (Building Inspector), Stephen Gugliotta AICP. Chairman declared quorum present. Approve Minutes of the September 10, 2020 meeting Member Swanson moved to approve the minutes, seconded by Member Benedict. Minutes were approved by voice vote. Update Past Overall Code Review Commission items. • Variance request of Section 1016 of the 2012 International Fire Code and 2012 International Building Code to allow the increase in the exit egress distance required by table 1016.2, located at 1801 Monmouth Blvd.was passed. • Variance request of section 1008.1.5 and section 1008.1.6 Landings at doors. Request to reduce landing size at rear door from required 44” length to 30”inches,located at 240 E. Simmons St. was passed. OC-20-1201 Public Hearing Variance request of Section 602, table 602 of the 2012 International Building Code, Fire resistance ratings requirements for exterior walls based on separation distance. Request is to allow a reduction of the 1hr fire rating at 10’ due to distance, located at 1172 Monroe St. Jeff Craft (contractor), Mike Tolle and Dan Levi (architectural firm) were present on behalf of the business via video. The property is located at 1172 Monroe Street. The owner is proposing to perform a complete renovation that will include removing almost all the interior walls and the roof and reconstructing the structure for the Knox Family Dental offices. Section 602 and table 602 of the 2012 International Building Code requires that an exterior wall of a building that is > 5 to 10 feet from property lines have a 1 hour fire rating. The existing north exterior wall of the structure is approximately 9 foot 8 inches away from the north property line. The petitioner is requesting a variance of the required 1 hour fire rating on the basis that it is only inches from the requirement, and the additional work and changes to the existing wall to make it conform is going to add extensive cost. A motion was made by Member Benbow and a second from Member Benedict to approve the variance. Roll Call #1 Aye: Benbow, Benedict, Groom, Swanson, 4. Nays: None. Abstentions: None. Chairperson declared the motion approved. There being no further business Member Swanson made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Member Benbow. The meeting adjourned at 5:49 p.m. ______________________________ Steve Gugliotta, AICP Executive Secretary _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TO: Overall Code Review Commission FROM: Eric Heiden, Code Compliance Supervisor DATE: February 2, 2022 SUBJECT: OC-22-0201 The property is located at 95 N Seminary St. The owner is proposing to be Grandfathered in from complying with the 2012 IBC Section 705 Table 705.8, which states that buildings that are within 0’ to 3’ from the property line are not allowed to have any openings. Currently 17.5% of the South wall has openings and would be Grandfathered in if the windows are not replaced. The current set back is 1’8” from the property line. If a 3.5’ no build easement was granted it would create a total setback of 5’1” from the building wall. They are also asking for a variance for future construction phases to be considered as having a 5’ to 10’ Fire Separation Distance from adjacent properties. The future building is anticipated to have a change in occupancy from B to A3, and to be protected by a fully automatic sprinkler. This would allow them to have 25% of the south wall be window openings per table 705.8. A copy of the table from the code section that the petitioner is requesting a variance of is attached for your review. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TO: Overall Code Review Commission FROM: Eric Heiden, Code Compliance Supervisor DATE: February 2, 2022 SUBJECT: OC-22-0202 The property is located at 1611 Grand Ave. The owner has constructed wood framed walls to section off a portion of the space for gaming purposes. Electrical work has already been ran through out the walls. Section 602 and table 601 of the 2012 International Building Code does not allow for wood studs in a type I or type II building. The petitioner is requesting a variance that would allow the use of the existing wood studs. They propose the use of Painted Pine Siding with a Class C Flame Spread to be placed on the 2x4 framing. See attached drawing below. A copy of the table and the code section that the petitioner is requesting a variance of is attached for your review.